AI & LLM Security Testing

Isolate model alignment vulnerabilities and secure cognitive pipelines. Our elite AI & LLM Security Testing (VAPT) services audit direct prompt parameters, prevent indirect prompt injections, evaluate RAG vector corridors, map plugin boundaries, and stress-test autonomous agency.

Request AI VAPT

"AI & LLM Security Testing is the specialized technical validation of cognitive applications, base weights, and integration pipelines. By simulating complex jailbreaks and parsing multi-tenant vector boundaries, we build ironclad trust around autonomous agent workflows."

Unlike traditional software APIs that execute deterministic logical loops, Large Language Models (LLMs) operate on probabilistic, semantic parameters. This architectural open-endedness introduces entirely new attack classes. Threat actors do not need to exploit code buffers; they can simply chat with your system, using natural language prompt injection to bypass system controls, siphon proprietary RAG archives, or hijack downstream APIs.

Our comprehensive AI security service audits your deployment across every layer. We stress-test input boundaries to block prompt hijackings, verify the integrity of vector search databases, map autonomous plugin authority, and validate output handling to prevent reflected XSS or RCE. The result is a resilient, secure, and compliant enterprise AI ecosystem.

ALIGNMENT
Guardrails Validated
VECTOR DBs
Endpoints Audited
PIPELINES
Secure SDLC Integrated

"You cannot secure a probabilistic model with deterministic code alone— active guardrail validation and strict agency control are the only ways to ensure your autonomous agents behave under pressure."

Safety Containment: Securing AI Gateways and Blocking Injection Vector Spills

Cognitive Pipeline Security Visualization

The Critical Risks of Insecure AI Systems

System Guardrail Overrides

Adversarial prompts bypass structural alignments, causing models to reveal raw system templates or execute rogue commands.

RAG Semantic Poisoning

Attackers inject corrupt metadata or poisoned search chunks into RAG paths, silently poisoning output logic.

Autonomous Plugin Hijackings

Excessive agency lets models convert injected text into active API updates, leading to unauthorized operations.

80%+
Guardrail Bypasses
Over 80% of native LLM deployments are vulnerable to advanced jailbreak techniques on their first testing run.
95%
RAG Context Leaks
Almost 95% of custom vector search layers lack dynamic user-level ACL checks, risking internal database leaks.
OWASP
LLM Top 10
Our technical assessments are strictly mapped against the latest OWASP LLM security standards.
100%
Agency Audited
We fully isolate autonomous plugin permissions to secure action-taking pathways.

The Evolving AI & LLM Threat Landscape

Derived from OWASP Top 10 for LLMs & MITRE ATLAS™ Framework

Direct Prompt Injection

Crafting adversarial inputs to bypass system alignments and force the LLM to execute prohibited, out-of-bounds commands.

Indirect Prompt Injection

Injecting malicious instructions into remote external files, web resources, or databases queried by RAG pipelines to hijack sessions.

Training Data Poisoning

Corrupting fine-tuning datasets or base pre-training pools to introduce logic backdoors or safety-bypass trigger words.

Insecure Output Handling

Allowing raw model outputs to render directly in UI templates, enabling malicious Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) or remote command executions.

Model Denial of Service

Flooding AI engines with recursively complex prompts or highly padded context scopes to spike resource usage and exhaust GPUs.

Sensitive Data Disclosure

Extracting hidden system guidelines, proprietary prompt templates, or training PII through targeted extraction attacks.

Insecure Plugin Design

Exploiting overprivileged tool integrations that accept unvalidated text strings from the model to execute state-changing actions.

Excessive Agency Gaps

Permitting autonomous agents to trigger destructive, unvalidated file operations or API callbacks without human-in-the-loop gates.

Overreliance Vulnerability

Failing to validate synthetically generated codes or logic inputs, resulting in silent code-execution compromises.

Model Theft & Extraction

Exfiltrating private weights, proprietary parameters, or structural configurations through high-volume API queries.

Why AI & LLM Security Testing is Critical

Deploying resilient cognitive structures requires active verification. AI penetration testing isolates input injection vectors, verifies RAG storage parameters, limits plugin scopes, and ensures model interactions align with strict enterprise safety protocols.

Block Injection & Jailbreaks

Stress-test prompt filters and system guardrails, locking down model behaviors against adversarial hijackings.

Secure Semantic RAG Corridors

Validate vector endpoints and tenant tokens to prevent data leakage and metadata poisoning within vector databases.

Isolate Plugin & Agency Authority

Enforce granular permissions and strict authorization controls on autonomous agent tools and down-stream API relays.

Build Customer AI Trust

Demonstrate safety alignment to compliance bodies, satisfying key SOC 2 trust principles and upcoming AI regulations.

Comprehensive Assessment Scope

Our rigorous AI penetration testing scope covers the three critical dimensions of cognitive system security: Prompt & Safety Guardrail Auditing, RAG & Vector Database Integrity, and Autonomous Integration & Agency Controls.

Prompt Injection & Safety Guardrail Auditing

Rigorous stress-testing of direct prompt structures, system instruction barriers, and alignment filters to prevent jailbreaks.

Jailbreak and system prompt override attempts under adversarial loads
Indirect prompt injection vulnerability checks via external RAG data flows
Safety alignment boundary auditing across diverse behavioral domains
Insecure output rendering analysis (XSS, CSRF, or RCE reflecting payloads)
PII and system instruction exfiltration resistance profiling
Verifying input pre-filters and prompt-wall protection controls

RAG & Vector Database Integrity Auditing

Detailed security analysis of retrieval-augmented corridors, vector database nodes, and search indexing mechanics.

Embedding manipulation and semantic vector space hijacking tests
Analyzing vector DB endpoint authorization and tenant isolation keys
Prompt cache poisoning and retrieval corruption stress-tests
Auditing database queries against unauthorized directory lookups
Verifying secure transport and storage of private semantic archives
Testing resilience to malicious metadata injection and RAG bias

Integrations, Plugins & Agency Verification

Active safety validation of tool invocation bounds, overprivileged plug-ins, and autonomous agent loops.

Evaluating plugin permission scopes and authentication token relays
Testing autonomous agent execution paths against destructive operations
Analyzing API output parsing for structural command injections
Testing model Denial of Service (DoS) threshold boundaries on token flows
Supply chain auditing of base models, Hugging Face endpoints, and LLM libs
Verifying human-in-the-loop authorization gates on high-risk actions

Our AI Testing & VAPT Methodology

Our highly structured VAPT lifecycle combines static prompt-wall mapping, active jailbreak attacks, vector boundary testing, and plugin privilege sweeps to evaluate your AI model deployments.

01

Discover & Threat Modeling

We map out AI endpoints, model specifications, system prompts, retrieval context layouts, and autonomous plugin parameters.

02

Jailbreak & Prompt Injection

We perform automated and manual adversarial prompt injections, evaluating model alignments against system overrides.

03

RAG & Vector DB Stress-Testing

We audit semantic vector corridors, simulating database exfiltrations, cache poisonings, and metadata injections.

04

Plugin & Tool Agency Sweeps

We evaluate autonomic tool triggers, executing state-changing relays to check verification blocks and token bounds.

05

Harden & Verify

We supply secure prompt templates and network GPOs, conducting secondary sweeps to supply a CERT-In backed attestation.

What You Receive

We deliver actionable prompt injection reports, vector DB trust maps, secure system templates, and signed compliance attestations.

Safety Alignment & Injection Registry

"Detailed findings of prompt boundary audits, guardrail bypasses, insecure output reflects, and step-by-step proof-of-concepts."

Why Choose Arridae

We combine deep cognitive threat intelligence with accredited penetration expertise to safely validate your AI models, vector stores, and automated plugin tools.

Expert CERT-In AI Audit Specialists

Assessments directed strictly by CERT-In accredited specialists with extensive experience auditing model guardrails and vector DB endpoints.

Adversarial ATLAS Mapping

Assessments mapped fully to MITRE ATLAS™ and OWASP LLM matrices to capture all emerging cognitive threat vectors.

Advanced Prompt Injection Engine

We deploy state-of-the-art fuzzers and manual jailbreak models to discover hidden safety boundary overrides.

Zero Operational Downtime

All automated prompt surges and context boundary stress-tests are safely limited to protect live GPU node capacities.

Granular Vector DB Inspections

Deep validation of tenant-isolation token mechanics, database indices, and secure RAG data corridors.

Compliance-Ready certified Attestations

Receive certified reports signed by accredited auditors to easily satisfy SOC 2 and international AI regulatory standards.

“AI models introduce cognitive, probabilistic pathways— sandboxed plugin architectures and resilient guardrails are what secure the core when prompts leak. ”

Harden Model Guardrails and Secure Your AI Pipelines Today

Get a professional AI & LLM Security Testing (VAPT) assessment featuring direct/indirect injection tests, vector DB audits, and certified compliance attestations.

AI Security Testing Q&A

Commonly asked questions about LLM penetration testing, prompt injections, vector DB safety, autonomous plugin agency, and our methodology.